Words: Elaine Quinn
Image Credits: Open Source
Reading Time: 30 second

The Law and Society Association Conference took place in New Orleans at the beginning of June 2016. One of the roundtable discussions was on “Responsive Judging”.

In a guest blog post on the website for the International Therapeutic Jurisprudence in the Mainstream project, Ann Marie Dewhurst, PhD, Registered Psychologist writes about her reflections after attending the roundtable. Responsive Judging was defined as “a range of behaviours and approaches used by judges to more effectively attend to issues and problems that emerge in the justice system”. It is particularly focused on the way judges relate to those in the courtroom. The roundtable discussion highlighted “the need for a responsive judge to be someone who created a deliberate connection with those in the courtroom, including the person appearing before the judge as well as those supporting the justice process”.

Read the blog post in full on Mainstream Therapeutic Jurisprudence website.

CONSCIOUS CONTENT STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX

Subscribe to access the third edition in full

ENJOYED THIS READ?

Please share this article

EXPLORE A LITTLE MORE:

APRIL 2018: Transnational Law Summit

The Dickson Poon School of Law at Kings College London convened...

FEATURE: Beauty, Totality, Violent Law

I REMEMBER THOSE HEADY DAYS BEFORE AND AFTER THE LONDON SUMMER...

JULY 2017: United Nations Ocean Conference...

At the United Nations Oceans Conference in New York in June,...